If the Serving Team Has the First Point After Deuce, the Score Would Be Advantage-Out

In the game of tennis, there are certain rules and scoring systems that dictate how a match unfolds. One such scenario arises when the serving team has the first point after deuce. In this situation, the score would be advantage-out. This means that if the server wins the first point after deuce, it’s known as advantage server or ad in. On the other hand, if the receiver wins the first point, it’s called advantage receiver or ad out. This specific scoring system adds a layer of excitement and tension to the game, as it places more emphasis on winning consecutive points. After deuce, the first player to win two consecutive points emerges victorious and wins the game. It’s important to note that in our matches, we follow a one-set format, where the first player to win a predetermined number of games comes out as the winner.

What Is the First Point After Deuce That You Win Called?

When it comes to the game of tennis, one of the most exciting moments is when the score reaches deuce. Deuce is when both players have a score of 40-40, and it signifies that the game is in a deadlock. However, the game must continue until one player scores two consecutive points to win.

So what happens when the serving team has the first point after deuce? The answer is simple – the score would be advantage-out. The next point that they score would win them the game.

This means that the receiving team has successfully eliminated the serving teams advantage, and both players are once again on equal footing.

The concept of advantage and deuce adds an element of suspense to the game of tennis. It can create dramatic moments where the outcome of the game hangs in the balance. It also adds an extra layer of strategy, as players must carefully consider their shots and tactics to gain the advantage and ultimately secure victory.

How Is the Advantage Determined in Tennis?

In tennis, the advantage is determined when a game reaches deuce, which means both players have a score of 40. If the serving team wins the next point, they’ve the advantage and the score becomes “advantage-in” for them. If the receiving team wins the point, the score goes back to deuce. The serving team must win the next point to win the game. If they do, they win the game. However, if they lose the point, the score returns to deuce once again, and the process continues until one team wins by two points.

However, this traditional scoring system in tennis has sparked a debate among players and fans alike. Some argue that it should be the receiver’s score that’s called first, rather than the server’s. This proposed change would break away from the long-standing practice and potentially bring about a shift in how tennis matches are called and perceived.

Should the Receivers Score Be Called First in Tennis?

Should the receivers score be called first in tennis? Normally the servers score is always called first and the receivers score second. Score calling in tennis is unusual in that (except in tie-breaks) each point has a corresponding call that’s different from it’s point value. This tradition stems from the origins of the game, where the server was seen as having an advantage and therefore deserving the recognition of having their score called first. However, some argue that it’s time for a change.

Supporters of calling the receivers score first argue that it would create a more balanced and fair system. They believe that the current practice of always calling the servers score first perpetuates a bias towards the server and can give the impression that they’re always in control of the game. By calling the receivers score first, it would shift the focus to the player who’s actually trying to return the serve and potentially put more pressure on the server to perform.

On the other hand, opponents of this proposed change argue that the current system is deeply ingrained in the tradition of tennis and changing it would disrupt the historical significance of the game. They argue that the tradition of calling the servers score first has become an integral part of the sports identity and altering it would be unnecessary and potentially confusing for players and fans alike.

While some may argue for a change to promote fairness, others may argue for the preservation of tradition. As the sport continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see if any changes are made to the score calling system and how players and fans respond to them.

The History and Evolution of Tennis Score Calling

  • The origins of tennis can be traced back to the 12th century
  • The scoring system in tennis underwent several changes over the years
  • In the early years, tennis scoring was based on the number of games won
  • By the late 19th century, the modern scoring system was adopted
  • The modern scoring system uses a combination of games, sets, and points
  • In a game, players can score either 0, 15, 30, or 40 points
  • If both players reach 40 points, it’s called “deuce”
  • From deuce, a player must win two consecutive points to win the game
  • A set consists of a number of games, typically 6 or 7
  • To win a set, a player must win at least 6 games, with a margin of 2 games
  • In most tournaments, a match consists of the best of 3 or 5 sets
  • The evolution of score calling technology has made accurate scoring easier
  • Modern tennis tournaments also utilize electronic scoreboards
  • The scoring system in tennis continues to be refined and adapted


In conclusion, when it comes to tennis scoring, there’s a unique system in place after deuce. The game is then decided by the first player to win two consecutive points. It’s important to note that in our matches, we follow a one-set format. Understanding these scoring nuances adds depth and excitement to the game, making every point crucial in determining the outcome.

Scroll to Top